Eminent Domain · October 16, 2026 · 4 minute read

Eminent Domain Capital Gains Tax: How to Protect Your Net Proceeds

Why Your Eminent Domain Settlement May Be Worth Less After Taxes

Finally landing the eminent domain deal that you’re satisfied with takes real effort. Months of negotiation, legal back-and-forth, and especially careful planning all play a key role in proceedings. But once that deal is done, a lot of sellers won’t find out until later that closing the deal with the price they love and actually keeping the proceeds are completely different matters.

Tax considerations often play the biggest part, and many investors underestimate this. Particularly in states like California, that underestimation can be devastating in ways that go well beyond the base federal rate that most sellers and attorneys plan for.

How California Capital Gains Taxes Affect Eminent Domain Proceeds

Federal capital gains tax gets most of the attention, and for good reason. But if you’re a property owner living in California and your gain pushes your income into the state’s top bracket, an additional rate applies.

California differs from other states in that it taxes capital gains as ordinary income. There is no short or preferential long-term rate when you’re talking about the state level. On top of that, the state’s highest marginal rate applies once you reach a certain income threshold. Combined with the top federal long-term capital gains rate and the net investment income tax, the total rate for California sellers can reach approximately 37% on the taxable gain, including California’s top 13.3% marginal rate.

On a large gain from an eminent domain award, that difference is far more than a rounding error. It represents a significant portion of what the property owner may walk away with. For sellers at or near that top bracket, the tax picture changes considerably from other states or typical cases and deserves specific attention from a tax professional before closing.

What Tax Deferral Strategies May Help Preserve Your Proceeds?

The good news is that reinvestment strategies exist precisely to minimize this problem. They are not loopholes but are part of the tax code, designed to encourage continued investment activity rather than an immediate withdrawal of the full amount.

For an eminent domain taking, the primary tool is Section 1033, which lets the owner defer the gain by reinvesting the award in qualifying replacement property within a replacement period of two to three years.

Depending on the situation, other approaches can spread the tax over more than one year rather than concentrating it in a single year, which can change the seller’s effective rate in meaningful ways.

The key point for owners notified of eminent domain proceedings is that planning should start before closing. Some decisions, such as how the award is described in the settlement, cannot be changed after the fact, and once the transaction closes the number of pathways narrows.

Section 1031 vs. Section 1033: Understanding Eminent Domain Tax Deferral

Owners who have done a Section 1031 exchange before often assume a taking works the same way. It does not. For a condemnation, Section 1033 is usually the better fit: its replacement period runs two to three years, and the owner can receive the award directly. A Section 1031 exchange can offer deferral in the right circumstances, but its requirements and deadlines are much stricter.

Under Section 1031, timing rules are particularly rigid, as property owners have only 45 days to identify replacement property and 180 days to close on it. Miss either one of these strict deadlines, and the exchange fails, triggering the tax. But when a 1031 exchange is executed correctly, the deferred gain stays until you eventually sell the replacement property.

Whether it’s a 1031 or a 1033 exchange, the rules are specific, and condemnations are rare enough that many advisors seldom see one, so speaking with someone experienced in them is important.

When to Seek Tax Advice Before Finalizing an Eminent Domain Settlement

Most sellers and attorneys focus the majority of their time on the deal structure and purchase price. Although it’s hard to blame them for that logic, the net proceeds are what truly matter, and that number is determined by how the seller leverages tax strategy and negotiating skill.

Bringing in advisors who understand California or other applicable state tax law before you close will help clarify options available to you, as these narrow significantly once the transaction is complete and the funds have changed hands.

Ultimately, the tax strategy helps determine the dollar amount that ends up in your hands when all is said and done.

Protect Your Net Proceeds Through Early Tax Planning

Sellers who focus only on the purchase price often leave meaningful money behind by forgetting about the net proceeds. For investors in California, the combination of state taxes, federal tax rates on high earners, and the net investment income surcharge can create a considerable gap between the closing number and the after-tax proceeds investors ultimately receive.

Reinvestment tools and deferral strategies were created to help savvy individuals preserve more of their investment capital. These strategies require planning, proper timing, and advisors who understand how these tools work and interact with each other. Property owners seeking to maximize available deferral mechanisms can preserve capital across future investments rather than paying it all in tax at once.

Negotiating might place the settlement deal in your hands, but the strategies and people you rely on to get there will determine how much of it you’re able to save after taxes.

Before you sign

Talk it through with Steve. Thirty minutes, no cost, no obligation.

We are not your lawyer and we do not negotiate awards. We work the tax side, with your attorney and your CPA. If you do not need us, we will tell you.

Steve Medendorp

Steve Medendorp

Steve Medendorp has worked in title and real estate law for more than twenty years and on eminent domain matters since 2012. He is a member of The Florida Bar and does not provide legal advice through Land & Tax Strategies; he works the tax side of a taking, with the owner's attorney and CPA.

About Steve →

Land & Tax Strategies, LLC is a Florida limited liability company; Matthew Chancey is a co-founder and manager. Mr. Chancey is a Registered Representative of Crescent Securities Group, Inc. (“CSG”), Member FINRA/SIPC, and an Investment Advisory Representative of Crescent Advisor Group, Inc. (“CAG”), an SEC Registered Investment Advisor. Brokerage services are offered through CSG. Investment advisory services are offered through CAG. Neither CSG nor CAG is affiliated with Land & Tax Strategies, LLC.

Steve Medendorp is a member of The Florida Bar. He does not provide legal advice through Land & Tax Strategies, and no attorney-client relationship is created by reading this article, booking a call or sending a message.

This article is general information about tax law as of its date, not legal, tax or investment advice for any specific taking, sale or award. Property owners should consult their attorney, CPA and qualified tax advisor about their own facts. Privacy Policy · Terms of Use